Solutions · B2B & SaaS

Earn a place on the buyer’s AI shortlist.

Find the use cases where competitors make the AI shortlist, answer the criteria buyers cut on and follow AI visits to sales conversations.

Accounts open from the waitlist. The website check is free, with no signup.

Where each brand stands for ClauseMinds: Ironclad named in 44% of answers, ClauseMinds second at 29% and clear of Luminance at 22%, Evisort and LinkSquares behind

Use cases

Find the use cases where the shortlist forms without you

Buyers ask by use case and company size. Track each use case on its own, find where a competitor owns the answer and decide where to compete.

Who wins where for ClauseMinds: ClauseMinds leads obligation tracking at 52% and is second on contract review, while Ironclad leads contract intake at 61% and CLM platforms at 66%

Criteria

Answer the criteria that decide the shortlist

Shortlists are cut on integrations, team size, hosting and price per seat. Find the criteria you’re marked down on, then publish the facts where engines read them.

ClauseMinds is described best for ease of setup at +78 and worst for integrations at −8, against Ironclad, Luminance and Evisort
What each brand is known for, net tone by quality: ClauseMinds strongest on accuracy and ease of setup, Ironclad on security and support
Questions won without ClauseMinds: Ironclad on 11 questions such as the best CLM platform for a mid-size company, Luminance on 6 and Evisort on 4

Pipeline

Follow AI visits to the pages that start a sales conversation

Follow AI-referred visits to the pages they land on and the trials that follow. Keep shortlist, visits and pipeline as separate measures.

AI traffic for ClauseMinds: 1,180 AI-referred sessions and 41 key events, sessions growing every month since July, the pages AI sends people to, crawler access and connections

Small firms: a shortlist built on G2.

When buyers ask for the best tool in your category and you never make the answer, find where the shortlist forms and write the page that answers.

What to write for ClauseMinds: the best AI contract review tool for small firms, never named in 30 answers, and how to track contract obligations after signing, where no page answers
Every engine reads G2, and those answers name Spellbook: citations flowing from each source through each engine to the brands named
A draft comparison for small-firm contract review graded against the 10 pages engines cite: the answer comes at word 120 and 2 tools are named, while a comparison table and pricing per seat are already there
Which pages AI reads, cites and sends people to: the startup contract review guide and the pricing page with sessions, key events and no break, and other pages where the path breaks

1Compare how often you are named for the category question and for the alternatives question, where buyers already know a competitor.

2Find the directories every engine reads and the competitors they name, before a buyer reaches your site.

3Check your comparison page against the pages engines cite before it ships, and fix where the answer comes late.

4Once the page ships, follow its crawler visits, citations and AI sessions.

Keep exploring.

Questions, answered.

Something else on your mind? Contact us.

Through the pages buyers land on. With analytics connected, Praised shows AI-referred visits to each page and the enquiries and trial sign-ups you count as key events. The shortlist, the visits and the pipeline stay separate measures.

Yes. Add the questions buyers ask with their constraints, such as a team size, an integration or a hosting region, and each one is tracked on its own, with the competitors named and the sources cited.

It checks a public page’s readiness to be found, understood and cited. Ongoing tracking and work belong in the platform.

Give buyers the facts that rule you in.

Find the use cases you compete for, publish what buyers need to rule you in, and follow the visits those pages earn. Check a page free, or explore how comparison pages are drafted and checked.