A product page should help someone choose.
Most product pages describe a mood. This kit helps you rewrite one around the facts a buyer needs: the job it does, who it suits, what it costs and where it falls short.
The ultimate AI platform to transform how legal teams work.
Unlock efficiency, reduce risk and empower your team with next-generation contract intelligence.
Request a demoContract review inside Word, for in-house legal teams.
ClauseMinds reviews supplier contracts inside Microsoft Word, for legal teams of 10 to 200 people. It flags risky clauses against your playbook. Your lawyers decide.
Install the Word add-inHow it works
- Open a contract in Word
- Run ClauseMinds from the ribbon
- Accept or reject each flagged clause as a tracked change
Who it suits
Legal teams of 10 to 200 who review contracts in Word and keep a playbook of the clauses they accept.
When another tool fits better
Teams with no lawyer who mainly track renewal dates. A contract management tool will suit them better.
Questions buyers ask
Facts last checked 6 October 2026 · Pricing · Security overview · Word add-in docs
What’s in the kit.
Four parts that work alone or together. All of it is editable, and the worked example sits at the back, apart from your draft.
Intake questions
Fourteen questions for product, sales and support, grouped by the decision they inform.
The page outline
Six blocks in order, each with a line on what to write in it.
Fact and review checklist
Twelve checks to run before the page ships, each with room for a name.
A before and after
An example product page, rewritten block by block from its intake answers.
The rewrite, block by block.
Six moves, in the order a buyer reads the page. Each one shows its part of the rewritten example.
Start with the job
Say what it is, who it’s for and the job it does, in one sentence. If a competitor could put the same sentence on its page, it isn’t specific enough yet.
In the rewrite“Contract review inside Word, for in-house legal teams.” It replaced “The ultimate AI platform to transform how legal teams work.”
Add the facts that change the decision
Price and billing, what it works with, the limits and how data is handled. Use facts the product team confirms, never ones invented to fill the space, and date them.
In the rewrite$49 per seat a month, billed yearly, from 5 seats. The old page said nothing about price or team size.
Show how it works
The job in three or four steps, the way a user would describe it. A buyer should be able to picture their first week with it.
In the rewriteOpen a contract in Word, run ClauseMinds from the ribbon, then accept or reject each flagged clause.
Say who it suits, and who it doesn’t
Name the situations it fits, and say honestly when another kind of tool fits better. The right buyers choose faster, and the page reads as fair.
In the rewriteTeams with no lawyer who mainly track renewal dates: a contract management tool will suit them better.
Answer the questions buyers ask
Take the questions the workbook mapped to this page, and answer each in full sentences that still make sense when quoted on their own.
In the rewriteDoes it suit a 40-person legal team? Yes. Teams of 10 to 200 share one playbook.
Check it before it ships
Run the fact and review checklist. The last check matters most: after reading the page, could someone explain why this product fits their situation?
In the rewriteFacts last checked 6 October 2026, with links to pricing, security and the add-in docs.
Get the kit.
The before and after is on this page. The kit is the part you work in: the intake questions, an editable page outline and the fact and review checklist.
One email with your copy, then a note only if the kit changes. One-click unsubscribe on every email. How we use your address.
Keep going.
Questions, answered.
Something else on your mind? Contact us.
For the file, yes. Everything on this page is free to read without one: every part, with the worked example. Your address gets you the kit here straight away and a copy in your inbox, and we write again only if it changes.
Yes. Upload the Word file to Google Drive and open it with Google Docs. There’s also a PDF to read, print or fill in by hand, and a Markdown version to paste into a wiki or a brief.
No. Every fact on the example page is illustrative, written to show the shape of a rewrite.
Nobody can promise that. A clearer page gives buyers, and AI tools, accurate facts to work with. To find out whether anything changed, ask the page’s questions again with the buyer-question workbook.
Yes. Put the intake answers and the outline in your brief. The draft then has real facts to work from. Then run the checklist on the draft, because a fact the tool filled in is still a fact someone has to confirm.
It checks a public page’s readiness to be found, understood and cited. Ongoing tracking and work belong in the platform.
Start with your website.
Check how ready your page is to be found, understood and cited by AI.